The Exchange had sought clarification from Reliance Industries with respect to media report flashed on November 04, 2016 on www.financialexpress.com titled, ‘KG basin gas row: Govt slaps $1.55 bn penalty on Reliance Industries’.
The company’s response is that earlier today, constituents of the Contractor (RIL, BP and Niko) for block KG-DWN-98/3 (KG D6) received a communication from the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas. Based on the recommendations of the Shah Committee, the Government has made a claim of about $1.55 billion against the Contractor parties in respect of gas said to have migrated from neighbouring blocks. In carrying out petroleum operations, the Contractor has worked within the boundaries of the block awarded to it and has complied with all applicable regulations and provisions of the Production Sharing Contract (PSC). The claim of the Government is based on misreading and misinterpretation of key elements of the PSC and is without precedent in the oil & gas industry, anywhere in the world. According to the Government the Contractor is restricted to producing only that quantity of hydrocarbon as they existed at the point in time when the PSC was signed. This approach overlooks the fundamental fact that at that stage the work of exploration of the block has not even commenced and a complete lack of data makes it impossible to estimate the quantity of hydrocarbons available in the block. The liability of the Contractor has not been established by any process known to law and the quantification of the purported claim is without any basis and arbitrary. RIL proposes to invoke the dispute resolution mechanism in the PSC and issue a Notice of Arbitration to the Government. RIL remains convinced of being able to fully justify and vindicate its position that the Governments claim is not sustainable.
The above information is a part of company’s filings submitted to BSE.
| Company Name | CMP |
|---|---|
| Reliance Industries | 2815.15 |
| Indian Oil Corp. | 158.95 |
| BPCL | 618.60 |
| HPCL | 501.45 |
| MRPL | 210.50 |
| View more.. | |
MoneyWorks4Me rating and ranking of funds for SIP is available to subscribers only. Moneyworks4Me is not a rating and ranking agency, however it is required that users have a way of selecting funds and building a Portfolio. The method used by it are described below to enable users to understand the logic behind the rating and ranking Subscriber will find more details on this in the various content made available from time to time. In case you need more please write to besafe@moneyworks4Me.com
MoneyWorks4Me rates and ranks mutual funds based on the following data-driven system:
Funds ranking in screeners: Performance Consistency and Quality are two parameters used for ranking funds for SIP. The ranking as follows GG, GO, GR, OG, OO, OR, RG, RO and RR.
With the same color-coded funds, the one with the higher Average 3-year rolling returns (over 5 to 10 years), the number that appears in the Performance tag, ranks higher.
Here is the summary:
The third tag Upside Potential is not relevant for SIP. It is relevant for lumpsum investments in Mutual Funds.
Buy quality Stocks when they are available at reasonable prices and supported by an upward price trend and Sell when they are Overvalued using the Decizen Rating System. Covers 3500+ stocks
Download APP
