My Dashboard
Fin. Planning
Our Solutions
Stocks
Funds
Create stable, long-term investment portfolio with strong, consistent stocks.
Start Research-backed Investing ...Now.
BSE: 505533 | NSE: WESTLIFE | Hotel, Resort & Restaurants | Small Cap
1. Is Westlife Foodworld Ltd a good quality company?
Past 10 year’s financial track record analysis by Moneyworks4me indicates that Westlife Foodworld Ltd is a below average quality company.
2. Is Westlife Foodworld Ltd undervalued or overvalued?
The key valuation ratios of Westlife Foodworld Ltd's currently when compared to its past seem to suggest it is in the Overvalued zone.
3. Is Westlife Foodworld Ltd a good buy now?
The Price Trend analysis by MoneyWorks4Me indicates it is Strong which suggest that the price of Westlife Foodworld Ltd is likely to Rise in the short term. However, please check the rating on Quality and Valuation before investing
Data adjusted to bonus, split, extra-ordinary income, rights issue and change in financial year end.
Value Creation ⓘValue Creation Index Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar'14 | Mar'15 | Mar'16 | Mar'17 | Mar'18 | Mar'19 | Mar'20 | Mar'21 | Mar'22 | Mar'23 | TTM | |||
| ROCE % ⓘ | 1% | -4.6% | -0.7% | -1.8% | 2.3% | 3.8% | 7.3% | -4.6% | 8.3% | 25.2% | - | ||
| Value Creation Index ⓘ | -0.9 | -1.3 | -1.1 | -1.1 | -0.8 | -0.7 | -0.5 | -1.3 | -0.4 | 0.9 | - | ||
Growth Parameters ⓘGrowth Parameters Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
|||||||||||||
| Sales ⓘ | 740 | 764 | 833 | 931 | 1,135 | 1,402 | 1,548 | 986 | 1,576 | 2,278 | 1,724 | ||
| YoY Gr. Rt. % | - | 3.2% | 9% | 11.7% | 21.9% | 23.5% | 10.4% | -36.3% | 59.9% | 44.5% | - | ||
| Adj EPS ⓘ | 0.1 | -2.4 | -1 | -1.5 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.1 | -6 | -0.1 | 7.4 | 7.5 | ||
| YoY Gr. Rt. % | - | -1915.4% | NA | NA | NA | 179.5% | -95.4% | -12000% | NA | NA | - | ||
| BVPS (₹) ⓘ | 36.1 | 34.2 | 34.4 | 33.7 | 34.5 | 37.1 | 36.7 | 30.6 | 29.5 | 36.3 | 38.1 | ||
| Adj Net Profit ⓘ | 2.1 | -36.7 | -15.5 | -23.4 | 6.1 | 17 | 0.8 | -92.6 | -1.5 | 116 | 117 | ||
| Cash Flow from Ops. ⓘ | 38 | 18.8 | 79.9 | 65.7 | 137 | 112 | 200 | 129 | 171 | 349 | - | ||
| Debt/CF from Ops. ⓘ | 1.7 | 7.2 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.6 | - | ||
CAGR ⓘCAGR Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Years | 5 Years | 3 Years | 1 Years | |||||||||
| Sales ⓘ | 13.3% | 15% | 13.8% | 44.5% | ||||||||
| Adj EPS ⓘ | 56.8% | 80.3% | 429.9% | NA | ||||||||
| BVPSⓘ | 0.1% | 1% | -0.4% | 23.1% | ||||||||
| Share Price | 9.8% | 23.4% | 37.8% | 40.9% | ||||||||
Key Financial Parameters ⓘPerformance Ratio Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar'14 | Mar'15 | Mar'16 | Mar'17 | Mar'18 | Mar'19 | Mar'20 | Mar'21 | Mar'22 | Mar'23 | TTM | ||
| Return on Equity % ⓘ | 0.5 | -6.7 | -2.9 | -4.4 | 1.1 | 3 | 0.1 | -17.5 | -0.3 | 22.6 | 20.1 | |
| Op. Profit Mgn % ⓘ | 6.5 | 2.5 | 5.7 | 5.4 | 7.5 | 8.9 | 14.1 | 6.2 | 13.1 | 17 | 22.6 | |
| Net Profit Mgn % ⓘ | 0.3 | -4.8 | -1.9 | -2.5 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.1 | -9.4 | -0.1 | 5.1 | 6.8 | |
| Debt to Equity ⓘ | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | - | |
| Working Cap Days ⓘ | 60 | 61 | 63 | 61 | 51 | 44 | 40 | 60 | 40 | 32 | 0 | |
| Cash Conv. Cycle ⓘ | -23 | -20 | -20 | -22 | -26 | -28 | -27 | -49 | -42 | -29 | 0 | |
Return on Equity has increased versus last 3 years average to 20.10%
Sales growth is growing at healthy rate in last 3 years 13.75%
Net Profit is growing at healthy rate in last 3 years 429.91%
Sales growth is good in last 4 quarters at 85.96%
No data to display
| Standalone | Consolidated | |
|---|---|---|
| TTM EPS (₹) | 3.8 | 7.5 |
| TTM Sales (₹ Cr.) | 62.4 | 1,724 |
| BVPS (₹.) ⓘ | 35 | 38.1 |
| Reserves (₹ Cr.) ⓘ | 514 | 564 |
| P/BV ⓘ | 28.03 | 25.69 |
| PE ⓘ | 258.09 | 130.75 |
| From the Market | |
|---|---|
| 52 Week Low / High (₹) | 635.00 / 1024.55 |
| All Time Low / High (₹) | 0.00 / 1024.55 |
| Market Cap (₹ Cr.) | 15,285 |
| Equity (₹ Cr.) | 31.2 |
| Face Value (₹) | 2 |
| Industry PE ⓘ | 48.3 |
| Pledged * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Westlife Development Limited (WDL) is a part of the Mumbai-based B.L. Jatia Group. WDL is one of the fastest growing players in India’s quick service restaurant (QSR) sector, focusing on putting up and operating QSR in India through its wholly owned subsidiary Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. (HRPL). Westlife Development operates a chain of McDonald’s restaurants in west and south India through its subsidiary Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. (HRPL).
HRPL operates many McDonald’s restaurants across many cities in the states of Maharashtra, Karnataka, Telangana, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Goa and parts of Madhya Pradesh, and provides direct employment. McDonald’s operates through various formats including standalone restaurants, drive-thru’s, mall food courts, McDelivery and dessert kiosks. It also has three thriving brand extensions - McDelivery, McCafe and McBreakfast.
Business area of the company
The company operates in the QSR sub-segment of the informal eating-out industry. Under the master franchisee arrangement with McDonald’s Corporation, the Company is responsible for financing all business operations and paying real estate interests, while McDonald’s Corporation offers technical, operational and business support.
Awards and Recognition
2015
2016
2018
2019
Milestones
2013
2015
2016
2017-18
2018-19
2020
MoneyWorks4Me rating and ranking of funds for SIP is available to subscribers only. Moneyworks4Me is not a rating and ranking agency, however it is required that users have a way of selecting funds and building a Portfolio. The method used by it are described below to enable users to understand the logic behind the rating and ranking Subscriber will find more details on this in the various content made available from time to time. In case you need more please write to besafe@moneyworks4Me.com
MoneyWorks4Me rates and ranks mutual funds based on the following data-driven system:
Funds ranking in screeners: Performance Consistency and Quality are two parameters used for ranking funds for SIP. The ranking as follows GG, GO, GR, OG, OO, OR, RG, RO and RR.
With the same color-coded funds, the one with the higher Average 3-year rolling returns (over 5 to 10 years), the number that appears in the Performance tag, ranks higher.
Here is the summary:
The third tag Upside Potential is not relevant for SIP. It is relevant for lumpsum investments in Mutual Funds.
Download APP
