My Dashboard
Fin. Planning
Our Solutions
Stocks
Funds
Invest in the best stock opportunities right now and every-time.
Start Systematic Stock Investing ...in less than a minute.
BSE: 532334 | NSE: | Construction - Real Estate | Small Cap
1. Is HB Estate Developers Ltd a good quality company?
Past 10 year’s financial track record analysis by Moneyworks4me indicates that HB Estate Developers Ltd is a below average quality company.
2. Is HB Estate Developers Ltd undervalued or overvalued?
The key valuation ratios of HB Estate Developers Ltd's currently when compared to its past seem to suggest it is in the Somewhat overvalued zone.
3. Is HB Estate Developers Ltd a good buy now?
The Price Trend analysis by MoneyWorks4Me indicates it is Weak which suggest that the price of HB Estate Developers Ltd is likely to Fall in the short term. However, please check the rating on Quality and Valuation before investing.
Data adjusted to bonus, split, extra-ordinary income, rights issue and change in financial year end.
Value Creation ⓘValue Creation Index Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar'14 | Mar'15 | Mar'16 | Mar'17 | Mar'18 | Mar'19 | Mar'20 | Mar'21 | Mar'22 | Mar'23 | TTM | |||
| ROCE % ⓘ | -5.4% | -3.7% | -2.3% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 1.8% | 1.8% | -3% | 0.2% | 1.1% | - | ||
| Value Creation Index ⓘ | -1.4 | -1.3 | -1.2 | -1.0 | -1.0 | -0.9 | -0.9 | -1.2 | -1.0 | -0.9 | - | ||
Growth Parameters ⓘGrowth Parameters Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
|||||||||||||
| Sales ⓘ | 43 | 64.5 | 68 | 73.4 | 83.8 | 89.2 | 82.1 | 24.4 | 50.4 | 96.4 | 101 | ||
| YoY Gr. Rt. % | - | 50.2% | 5.4% | 8% | 14.1% | 6.5% | -8% | -70.3% | 106.7% | 91.2% | - | ||
| Adj EPS ⓘ | -37.7 | -23.5 | -19.3 | 0 | -8.4 | -5.2 | -4.3 | -15.6 | -8.3 | -6 | -5.9 | ||
| YoY Gr. Rt. % | - | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | - | ||
| BVPS (₹) ⓘ | 52.6 | 29.7 | 10.6 | 0 | 122.2 | 112.8 | 105.6 | 89 | 80.9 | 74.5 | 73.9 | ||
| Adj Net Profit ⓘ | -45.4 | -37.9 | -31.1 | -20.1 | -16.3 | -10.1 | -8.4 | -30.4 | -16.1 | -11.6 | -12 | ||
| Cash Flow from Ops. ⓘ | -2.5 | -29.1 | 17.3 | 1.8 | 28.9 | 33.5 | 28.6 | -14.1 | 2.8 | 42.4 | - | ||
| Debt/CF from Ops. ⓘ | -144 | -10.7 | 18.6 | 162.6 | 10 | 8.6 | 9.6 | -23.3 | 125.7 | 7.8 | - | ||
CAGR ⓘCAGR Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Years | 5 Years | 3 Years | 1 Years | |||||||||
| Sales ⓘ | 9.4% | 2.9% | 5.5% | 91.2% | ||||||||
| Adj EPS ⓘ | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||||||||
| BVPSⓘ | 4% | -9.4% | -11% | -7.9% | ||||||||
| Share Price | 13.4% | 19.5% | 60.9% | 69.5% | ||||||||
Key Financial Parameters ⓘPerformance Ratio Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar'14 | Mar'15 | Mar'16 | Mar'17 | Mar'18 | Mar'19 | Mar'20 | Mar'21 | Mar'22 | Mar'23 | TTM | ||
| Return on Equity % ⓘ | -39.1 | -34.2 | -27.6 | -11.5 | -6.6 | -4.4 | -4 | -16 | -9.7 | -7.6 | -8 | |
| Op. Profit Mgn % ⓘ | 2.3 | 21 | 22.5 | 22.5 | 25.5 | 32.2 | 32.8 | -23.7 | 15.9 | 33.2 | 33 | |
| Net Profit Mgn % ⓘ | -105.6 | -58.8 | -45.7 | -27.4 | -19.5 | -11.3 | -10.3 | -124.4 | -31.9 | -12 | -11.5 | |
| Debt to Equity ⓘ | 3.8 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.3 | - | |
| Working Cap Days ⓘ | 344 | 225 | 213 | 215 | 182 | 142 | 140 | 455 | 221 | 122 | 0 | |
| Cash Conv. Cycle ⓘ | 174 | 77 | 42 | 0 | -10 | -4 | -7 | 124 | 40 | 15 | 0 | |
Sales growth is good in last 4 quarters at 59.32%
Return on Equity is Poor
Sales growth has been subdued in last 3 years 5.53%
Debt to equity has increased versus last 3 years average to 2.28
| Standalone | Consolidated | |
|---|---|---|
| TTM EPS (₹) | -5.9 | -5.9 |
| TTM Sales (₹ Cr.) | 101 | 101 |
| BVPS (₹.) ⓘ | 73.9 | 73.9 |
| Reserves (₹ Cr.) ⓘ | 124 | 124 |
| P/BV ⓘ | 0.52 | 0.52 |
| PE ⓘ | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| From the Market | |
|---|---|
| 52 Week Low / High (₹) | 18.60 / 44.00 |
| All Time Low / High (₹) | 0.70 / 152.75 |
| Market Cap (₹ Cr.) | 75 |
| Equity (₹ Cr.) | 19.5 |
| Face Value (₹) | 10 |
| Industry PE ⓘ | 57.9 |
| Pledged * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
HB Estate Developers was initially incorporated on September 20, 1994 under the name of HB Housing & Development Corporation with the main object of development of commercial and residential complexes. The name of the company was subsequently changed on January 23, 1996 to HB Estate Developers.
Pursuant to a Scheme of Arrangement sanctioned by the Delhi High Court the Real Estate Division of HB Stockholdings Limited (formerly HB Portfolio Leasing Limited) was transferred to and vested in the Company.
Using non-public information to trade in securities of the company, or providing a family member, friend or any other person with a 'tip', is illegal. All non-public information should be considered inside information and should never be used for personal gain.
The Board of Directors of the company has already put in place a Code of Conduct for Prevention of Insider Trading, copies of which have been circulated/distributed to all applicable employees, officers and directors. Accordingly all the Officers, employees and directors shall continue to adhere and follow the provisions of the said Code as amended by the Board from time to time.
Business area of the company:
The Company is primarily engaged in the development of commercial complexes. The Company is also planning to enter into development of residential complexes.
Projects undertaken by the company:
MoneyWorks4Me rating and ranking of funds for SIP is available to subscribers only. Moneyworks4Me is not a rating and ranking agency, however it is required that users have a way of selecting funds and building a Portfolio. The method used by it are described below to enable users to understand the logic behind the rating and ranking Subscriber will find more details on this in the various content made available from time to time. In case you need more please write to besafe@moneyworks4Me.com
MoneyWorks4Me rates and ranks mutual funds based on the following data-driven system:
Funds ranking in screeners: Performance Consistency and Quality are two parameters used for ranking funds for SIP. The ranking as follows GG, GO, GR, OG, OO, OR, RG, RO and RR.
With the same color-coded funds, the one with the higher Average 3-year rolling returns (over 5 to 10 years), the number that appears in the Performance tag, ranks higher.
Here is the summary:
The third tag Upside Potential is not relevant for SIP. It is relevant for lumpsum investments in Mutual Funds.
Download APP
