My Dashboard
Fin. Planning
Our Solutions
Stocks
Funds
Invest in the best stock opportunities right now and every-time.
Start Systematic Stock Investing ...in less than a minute.
BSE: 533012 | NSE: LPDC | Construction - Real Estate | Small Cap
1. Is Landmark Property Development Company Ltd a good quality company?
Past 10 year’s financial track record analysis by Moneyworks4me indicates that Landmark Property Development Company Ltd is a below average quality company.
2. Is Landmark Property Development Company Ltd undervalued or overvalued?
The key valuation ratios of Landmark Property Development Company Ltd's currently when compared to its past seem to suggest it is in the Overvalued zone.
3. Is Landmark Property Development Company Ltd a good buy now?
The Price Trend analysis by MoneyWorks4Me indicates it is Weak which suggest that the price of Landmark Property Development Company Ltd is likely to Fall in the short term. However, please check the rating on Quality and Valuation before investing.
Data adjusted to bonus, split, extra-ordinary income, rights issue and change in financial year end.
Value Creation ⓘValue Creation Index Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar'14 | Mar'15 | Mar'16 | Mar'17 | Mar'18 | Mar'19 | Mar'20 | Mar'21 | Mar'22 | Mar'23 | TTM | |||
| ROCE % ⓘ | 4.6% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 0.6% | 0.7% | -0.1% | -11.2% | - | ||
| Value Creation Index ⓘ | -0.7 | -0.9 | -0.9 | -0.9 | -0.9 | -1.0 | -1.0 | -1.0 | -1.0 | -1.8 | - | ||
Growth Parameters ⓘGrowth Parameters Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
|||||||||||||
| Sales ⓘ | 3.6 | 3.9 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1 | ||
| YoY Gr. Rt. % | - | 7.2% | -33.2% | -1.9% | -30.8% | -100% | NA | 1,011.1% | -30% | -41.4% | - | ||
| Adj EPS ⓘ | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0 | -0.5 | -0.5 | ||
| YoY Gr. Rt. % | - | -57.9% | -25% | 0% | -33.3% | -75% | 200% | 0% | -133.3% | NA | - | ||
| BVPS (₹) ⓘ | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 4.1 | ||
| Adj Net Profit ⓘ | 2.6 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | -0.1 | -6.5 | -6 | ||
| Cash Flow from Ops. ⓘ | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.3 | -2 | 0.1 | -0.8 | -0.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.3 | - | ||
| Debt/CF from Ops. ⓘ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | ||
CAGR ⓘCAGR Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Years | 5 Years | 3 Years | 1 Years | |||||||||
| Sales ⓘ | -21.5% | -25.2% | 65.8% | -41.4% | ||||||||
| Adj EPS ⓘ | -211.1% | -265.1% | -353.7% | NA | ||||||||
| BVPSⓘ | -0.5% | -1.9% | -3.5% | -10.6% | ||||||||
| Share Price | 11.1% | 13.1% | 43.3% | 10.5% | ||||||||
Key Financial Parameters ⓘPerformance Ratio Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar'14 | Mar'15 | Mar'16 | Mar'17 | Mar'18 | Mar'19 | Mar'20 | Mar'21 | Mar'22 | Mar'23 | TTM | ||
| Return on Equity % ⓘ | 4.6 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.7 | -0.1 | -11.2 | -11.4 | |
| Op. Profit Mgn % ⓘ | 37.3 | 20.7 | 14.9 | 16 | -17.1 | 0 | -459.5 | -32.8 | -144.6 | -1881.3 | -738.5 | |
| Net Profit Mgn % ⓘ | 72.6 | 26.7 | 32.2 | 33.7 | 30.3 | 0 | 421.3 | 40.2 | -11.3 | -1608.3 | -716.2 | |
| Debt to Equity ⓘ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | |
| Working Cap Days ⓘ | 5,318 | 4,923 | 7,321 | 7,505 | 11,871 | 0 | 2,47,184 | 21,367 | 30,443 | 48,454 | 0 | |
| Cash Conv. Cycle ⓘ | 734 | 1,330 | 1,936 | 2,010 | 2,890 | 0 | 55,836 | 4,774 | 6,486 | 10,841 | 0 | |
Sales growth is growing at healthy rate in last 3 years 65.77%
Return on Equity is Poor
Sales growth is not so good in last 4 quarters at -19.85%
| Standalone | Consolidated | |
|---|---|---|
| TTM EPS (₹) | -0.5 | - |
| TTM Sales (₹ Cr.) | 0.9 | - |
| BVPS (₹.) ⓘ | 4.1 | - |
| Reserves (₹ Cr.) ⓘ | 42 | - |
| P/BV ⓘ | 1.67 | - |
| PE ⓘ | 0.00 | - |
| From the Market | |
|---|---|
| 52 Week Low / High (₹) | 5.10 / 8.77 |
| All Time Low / High (₹) | 1.06 / 92.10 |
| Market Cap (₹ Cr.) | 93 |
| Equity (₹ Cr.) | 13.4 |
| Face Value (₹) | 1 |
| Industry PE ⓘ | 57.8 |
| Pledged * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Landmark Property Development Company (LPDCL) was incorporated as Konark Minerals Limited ( KML) on December 28, 1976, as public limited company with the Registrar of Companies, Orissa under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and obtained Certificate for Commencement of Business on January 19, 1977.
KML was a wholly owned subsidiary of OCL and as a result of the reorganization by way of demerger through the Scheme of Arrangement vide High Court Order dated 27.11.2007, the real estate ndertaking of OCL together with all its assets and liabilities stands transferred to and vested in LPDCL. The Scheme has become effective on December 20, 2007, the appointed being January 01, 2007 .The promoters of OCL India Limited continue to be the promoters of the company.
The main business of Landmark Property is to pursue real estate activities. With the demerger the company intends to carry on real estate business to cover all aspects of real estate development, from the identification and acquisition of land, to the planning, execution and marketing of its projects (including architecture, design management and interior design), through to the maintenance and management of its completed developments], as well as providing consultancy services on engineering, industrial and technical matters to all forms of industries including companies engaged in construction-development of real estate and infrastructure projects. In the commercial business area, the company's intention is to build, lease and sell commercial office space, with a focus on properties attractive to large multinational tenants. The company's intention with regard to its retail business area is to develop, manage and lease or sell shopping malls. In the residential area, the company aims to build and lease or sell a wide range of properties including houses, duplexes and apartments of varying sizes, with a focus on the higher end of the market.
The company was until recently engaged in the business of mining but the scale of operation was small. Post demerger the company would pursue full fledged real estate activities.
MoneyWorks4Me rating and ranking of funds for SIP is available to subscribers only. Moneyworks4Me is not a rating and ranking agency, however it is required that users have a way of selecting funds and building a Portfolio. The method used by it are described below to enable users to understand the logic behind the rating and ranking Subscriber will find more details on this in the various content made available from time to time. In case you need more please write to besafe@moneyworks4Me.com
MoneyWorks4Me rates and ranks mutual funds based on the following data-driven system:
Funds ranking in screeners: Performance Consistency and Quality are two parameters used for ranking funds for SIP. The ranking as follows GG, GO, GR, OG, OO, OR, RG, RO and RR.
With the same color-coded funds, the one with the higher Average 3-year rolling returns (over 5 to 10 years), the number that appears in the Performance tag, ranks higher.
Here is the summary:
The third tag Upside Potential is not relevant for SIP. It is relevant for lumpsum investments in Mutual Funds.
Download APP
