My Dashboard
Fin. Planning
Our Solutions
Stocks
Funds
Invest in the best stock opportunities right now and every-time.
Start Systematic Stock Investing ...in less than a minute.
BSE: 531228 | NSE: | Construction - Real Estate | Small Cap
1. Is Rander Corporation Ltd a good quality company?
Past 10 year’s financial track record analysis by Moneyworks4me indicates that Rander Corporation Ltd is a below average quality company.
2. Is Rander Corporation Ltd undervalued or overvalued?
The key valuation ratios of Rander Corporation Ltd's currently when compared to its past seem to suggest it is in the Fair zone.
3. Is Rander Corporation Ltd a good buy now?
The Price Trend analysis by MoneyWorks4Me indicates it is Weak which suggest that the price of Rander Corporation Ltd is likely to Fall in the short term. However, please check the rating on Quality and Valuation before investing.
Data adjusted to bonus, split, extra-ordinary income, rights issue and change in financial year end.
Value Creation ⓘValue Creation Index Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar'13 | Mar'14 | Mar'15 | Mar'16 | Mar'17 | Mar'18 | Mar'19 | Mar'20 | Mar'21 | Mar'22 | TTM | |||
| ROCE % ⓘ | 9% | 2.4% | 3.2% | 1.2% | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 4.2% | - | ||
| Value Creation Index ⓘ | -0.4 | -0.8 | -0.8 | -0.9 | -1.0 | -0.9 | -1.0 | -1.0 | -1.0 | -0.7 | - | ||
Growth Parameters ⓘGrowth Parameters Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
|||||||||||||
| Sales ⓘ | 0.7 | 5.3 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 3.7 | 4 | ||
| YoY Gr. Rt. % | - | 680.9% | -18.3% | -16.6% | -47.8% | -12.2% | -27.7% | -85.8% | 635.3% | 192.8% | - | ||
| Adj EPS ⓘ | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | ||
| YoY Gr. Rt. % | - | 176.9% | 38.9% | -62% | -42.1% | 27.3% | -35.7% | -88.9% | 600% | 785.7% | - | ||
| BVPS (₹) ⓘ | 1.5 | 15.1 | 15.6 | 15.8 | 15.9 | 16.1 | 16.2 | 16.2 | 16.3 | 16.5 | 17.4 | ||
| Adj Net Profit ⓘ | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1 | ||
| Cash Flow from Ops. ⓘ | -4 | -0.7 | -0.6 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 1 | -0.3 | 0.1 | -3.1 | - | ||
| Debt/CF from Ops. ⓘ | -0 | -0.9 | -0.9 | 7 | -0.2 | -0.2 | 0 | -0.1 | 0 | 0 | - | ||
CAGR ⓘCAGR Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Years | 5 Years | 3 Years | 1 Years | |||||||||
| Sales ⓘ | 20.6% | 14.1% | 45% | 192.8% | ||||||||
| Adj EPS ⓘ | 19% | 41.3% | 90.3% | 785.7% | ||||||||
| BVPSⓘ | 30.8% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 1.1% | ||||||||
| Share Price | -31.3% | -4.3% | -5.9% | 28% | ||||||||
Key Financial Parameters ⓘPerformance Ratio Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar'13 | Mar'14 | Mar'15 | Mar'16 | Mar'17 | Mar'18 | Mar'19 | Mar'20 | Mar'21 | Mar'22 | TTM | ||
| Return on Equity % ⓘ | 9 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 3.8 | |
| Op. Profit Mgn % ⓘ | 50.1 | 13.5 | 19.5 | 7.3 | 10.6 | 10.9 | 12 | -81.4 | 9.2 | 31.3 | 26.7 | |
| Net Profit Mgn % ⓘ | 236.6 | 8.5 | 14.2 | 6.4 | 7.4 | 10.2 | 9 | 7 | 6.7 | 21.1 | 20 | |
| Debt to Equity ⓘ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | |
| Working Cap Days ⓘ | 9,208 | 1,512 | 2,013 | 2,322 | 4,375 | 4,447 | 5,505 | 36,087 | 4,831 | 1,631 | 0 | |
| Cash Conv. Cycle ⓘ | -1,491 | 64 | 24 | 66 | 60 | -63 | -149 | 3,352 | 600 | 158 | 0 | |
Return on Equity has increased versus last 3 years average to 3.80%
Sales growth is growing at healthy rate in last 3 years 45.02%
Net Profit is growing at healthy rate in last 3 years 90.28%
Sales growth is good in last 4 quarters at 13.72%
No data to display
| Standalone | Consolidated | |
|---|---|---|
| TTM EPS (₹) | 0.6 | - |
| TTM Sales (₹ Cr.) | 3.9 | - |
| BVPS (₹.) ⓘ | 17.4 | - |
| Reserves (₹ Cr.) ⓘ | 9 | - |
| P/BV ⓘ | 0.54 | - |
| PE ⓘ | 14.80 | - |
| From the Market | |
|---|---|
| 52 Week Low / High (₹) | 4.46 / 9.45 |
| All Time Low / High (₹) | 0.50 / 720.00 |
| Market Cap (₹ Cr.) | 11.7 |
| Equity (₹ Cr.) | 12.3 |
| Face Value (₹) | 10 |
| Industry PE ⓘ | 58.4 |
| Pledged * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Rander Corporation was incorporated as a public limited company on December 27, 1993 through a public issue to enable better services in construction business.
Shanti Construction which was founded in 1983 by Mr.Amarchand Rander was merged with Rander Corporation. The projects that were undertaken by Shanti Construction are Madhav Kripa (65 units), Keshav Dham (63 units), Shanti Ganga (30 units), Shanti Sarita (30 units), Shanti Sagar (15 units), Shanti Vihar (30 units), Shanti Sadan (30 units), Shanti Niketan (15 units), Geet Apartments (30 units), Sangeet Apartments (30 units), Raag Apartments (30 units) and Anuraag Apartments (15 units). Therefore all the projects of Shanti Construction were taken under the wings of Rander Corporation.
The projects which were brought under Rander Corporation were Shanti Dhaam (36 units), Shanti Laxmi (36 units), Shanti Niwas (24 units) and Shanti Kripa (48 units).
Besides construction, the company is also involved in other different activities such as financing, share broking and investments.
Company’s registered office is located at Unit No. 35/B, Building No. 1, Ganjawala Shopping Centre, S. V. P. Road, Borivali (W), Mumbai - 400 092.
The company has undertaken 2 mega projects in Boisar Maharashtra at Keshav Nagar and Krishna Nagar.
In 2011 Rander Corporation Ltd. received import export license and diversifies its business by foraying into trading business.
MoneyWorks4Me rating and ranking of funds for SIP is available to subscribers only. Moneyworks4Me is not a rating and ranking agency, however it is required that users have a way of selecting funds and building a Portfolio. The method used by it are described below to enable users to understand the logic behind the rating and ranking Subscriber will find more details on this in the various content made available from time to time. In case you need more please write to besafe@moneyworks4Me.com
MoneyWorks4Me rates and ranks mutual funds based on the following data-driven system:
Funds ranking in screeners: Performance Consistency and Quality are two parameters used for ranking funds for SIP. The ranking as follows GG, GO, GR, OG, OO, OR, RG, RO and RR.
With the same color-coded funds, the one with the higher Average 3-year rolling returns (over 5 to 10 years), the number that appears in the Performance tag, ranks higher.
Here is the summary:
The third tag Upside Potential is not relevant for SIP. It is relevant for lumpsum investments in Mutual Funds.
Download APP
