My Dashboard
Fin. Planning
Our Solutions
Stocks
Funds
Invest in the best stock opportunities right now and every-time.
Start Systematic Stock Investing ...in less than a minute.
1. Is Nutricircle Ltd a good quality company?
Past 10 year’s financial track record analysis by Moneyworks4me indicates that Nutricircle Ltd is a below average quality company.
2. Is Nutricircle Ltd undervalued or overvalued?
The key valuation ratios of Nutricircle Ltd's currently when compared to its past seem to suggest it is in the Fair zone.
3. Is Nutricircle Ltd a good buy now?
The Price Trend analysis by MoneyWorks4Me indicates it is Weak which suggest that the price of Nutricircle Ltd is likely to Fall in the short term. However, please check the rating on Quality and Valuation before investing.
Data adjusted to bonus, split, extra-ordinary income, rights issue and change in financial year end.
Value Creation ⓘValue Creation Index Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar'13 | Mar'14 | Mar'15 | Mar'16 | Mar'17 | Mar'18 | Mar'19 | Mar'20 | Mar'21 | Mar'22 | TTM | |||
| ROCE % ⓘ | -20.5% | -9.8% | -25.4% | -82.5% | 2.4% | -18.6% | -108.6% | -39.4% | -74.3% | -68.2% | - | ||
| Value Creation Index ⓘ | -2.5 | -1.7 | -2.8 | NA | -0.8 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | - | ||
Growth Parameters ⓘGrowth Parameters Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
|||||||||||||
| Sales ⓘ | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.3 | 2 | ||
| YoY Gr. Rt. % | - | -81% | -100% | NA | 117.4% | -100% | NA | NA | -100% | NA | - | ||
| Adj EPS ⓘ | -0.4 | -0.2 | -0.5 | -32.2 | 0.8 | -7.3 | -38.4 | -8.9 | -13.2 | -11 | -24.2 | ||
| YoY Gr. Rt. % | - | NA | NA | NA | NA | -978.3% | NA | NA | NA | NA | - | ||
| BVPS (₹) ⓘ | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.5 | -22.5 | -21.7 | -29 | -67.3 | -76.3 | -89.5 | -100.4 | -127 | ||
| Adj Net Profit ⓘ | -0.2 | -0.1 | -0.3 | -0.9 | 0 | -0.2 | -1 | -0.2 | -0.4 | -0.3 | -1 | ||
| Cash Flow from Ops. ⓘ | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.3 | -0.4 | -0.2 | -0.7 | -0.3 | -0.3 | -0.2 | -0.4 | - | ||
| Debt/CF from Ops. ⓘ | -3.7 | -3.1 | -3 | -4 | -7.4 | -2.9 | -7.8 | -10.5 | -12.4 | -9.3 | - | ||
CAGR ⓘCAGR Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Years | 5 Years | 3 Years | 1 Years | |||||||||
| Sales ⓘ | -23.3% | -12.9% | NA | NA | ||||||||
| Adj EPS ⓘ | NA | -267.5% | NA | NA | ||||||||
| BVPSⓘ | -262.4% | NA | NA | NA | ||||||||
| Share Price | 53% | 27.8% | 59.9% | 104.5% | ||||||||
Key Financial Parameters ⓘPerformance Ratio Colour Code Guide ⓘ |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar'13 | Mar'14 | Mar'15 | Mar'16 | Mar'17 | Mar'18 | Mar'19 | Mar'20 | Mar'21 | Mar'22 | TTM | ||
| Return on Equity % ⓘ | -26.5 | -14.7 | -57.9 | 502.7 | -3.8 | 28.8 | 79.6 | 12.4 | 16 | 11.5 | 21.3 | |
| Op. Profit Mgn % ⓘ | -8.7 | -20 | 0 | -380.5 | 3.6 | 0 | 0 | -106.1 | 0 | -123.7 | -20.1 | |
| Net Profit Mgn % ⓘ | -8.8 | -20.4 | 0 | -373.9 | 4.6 | 0 | 0 | -110.8 | 0 | -119.1 | -40.4 | |
| Debt to Equity ⓘ | 0.4 | 0.7 | 2.9 | -2.8 | -2.3 | -2.7 | -1.3 | -1.3 | -1.2 | -1.2 | - | |
| Working Cap Days ⓘ | 325 | 1,648 | 0 | 1,324 | 675 | 0 | 0 | 1,356 | 0 | 1,087 | 0 | |
| Cash Conv. Cycle ⓘ | 86 | 755 | 0 | 1,157 | 338 | 0 | 0 | 122 | 0 | -177 | 0 | |
Return on Equity has increased versus last 3 years average to 21.30%
Sales growth is good in last 4 quarters at 15.00%
Sales growth has been subdued in last 3 years 0.00%
| Standalone | Consolidated | |
|---|---|---|
| TTM EPS (₹) | -24.2 | - |
| TTM Sales (₹ Cr.) | 1.6 | - |
| BVPS (₹.) ⓘ | -127 | - |
| Reserves (₹ Cr.) ⓘ | -4 | - |
| P/BV ⓘ | -1.53 | - |
| PE ⓘ | 0.00 | - |
| From the Market | |
|---|---|
| 52 Week Low / High (₹) | 73.65 / 206.15 |
| All Time Low / High (₹) | 0.55 / 206.15 |
| Market Cap (₹ Cr.) | 5.3 |
| Equity (₹ Cr.) | 0.3 |
| Face Value (₹) | 10 |
| Industry PE ⓘ | 38.1 |
| Pledged * | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Shreeyash Industries was incorporated on June 23, 1993 as private limited company under the name Range Apparels and was subsequently converted into a public limited company on February 21, 1994. The registered office of the company is situated at 114-6S6/A, AC Guards, Hyderabad 500 004, Andhra Pradesh.
The company is promoted by Mano Kumar and his wife Sumedha Saraogi in technical arrangement with Kuke Nylon Co., (KNC), S Korea, for setting up a new 100% EOU for the manufacture of knitted designer cotton socks of international standards/quality with an installed capacity of 29.45 lakhs pairs per annum at Jeedimetla, Ranga Reddy district, AP.
In 1996 - the company set up a dying plant along with cone winding machine to augment the need for good quality of dying and timely availability of raw material at short notice. In the same year, the company entered into a buyback agreement with Dongwon Trading Co., Korea for marketing of the products.
MoneyWorks4Me rating and ranking of funds for SIP is available to subscribers only. Moneyworks4Me is not a rating and ranking agency, however it is required that users have a way of selecting funds and building a Portfolio. The method used by it are described below to enable users to understand the logic behind the rating and ranking Subscriber will find more details on this in the various content made available from time to time. In case you need more please write to besafe@moneyworks4Me.com
MoneyWorks4Me rates and ranks mutual funds based on the following data-driven system:
Funds ranking in screeners: Performance Consistency and Quality are two parameters used for ranking funds for SIP. The ranking as follows GG, GO, GR, OG, OO, OR, RG, RO and RR.
With the same color-coded funds, the one with the higher Average 3-year rolling returns (over 5 to 10 years), the number that appears in the Performance tag, ranks higher.
Here is the summary:
The third tag Upside Potential is not relevant for SIP. It is relevant for lumpsum investments in Mutual Funds.
Download APP
