Past 10 year’s financial track record analysis by Moneyworks4me indicates that CLS Ltd is a below average quality company.
No data found
No data found
Data adjusted to bonus, split, extra-ordinary income, rights issue and change in financial year end.
| Mar'11 | Mar'12 | Mar'13 | Mar'14 | Mar'15 | Mar'16 | Mar'17 | Mar'18 | Mar'19 | TTM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE % ⓘ | 7.9% | 11% | 9.3% | 10.4% | 8% | 3.9% | 5.6% | 8.3% | 11.1% | - |
| Value Creation Index ⓘ | -0.4 | -0.2 | -0.3 | -0.3 | -0.4 | -0.7 | -0.6 | -0.4 | -0.2 | - |
Growth Parameters ⓘGrowth Parameters Colour Code Guide ⓘ | ||||||||||
| Sales ⓘ | 12.5 | 20.9 | 31.1 | 35.9 | 36.9 | 44.2 | 54.2 | 78.9 | 90.5 | 90 |
| Sales YoY Gr. | - | 67.8% | 48.8% | 15.5% | 2.8% | 19.5% | 22.7% | 45.7% | 14.6% | - |
| Adj EPS ⓘ | 49.8 | 75.3 | 71.9 | 120.6 | 115.8 | 52.2 | 80.7 | 122.4 | 171.9 | 0 |
| YoY Gr. | - | 51.1% | -4.5% | 67.8% | -4% | -54.9% | 54.6% | 51.7% | 40.4% | - |
| BVPS (₹) ⓘ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Adj Net Profit ⓘ | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.1 | NAN |
| Cash Flow from Ops. ⓘ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | -0.2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1 | - |
| Debt/CF from Ops. ⓘ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.6 | 17.7 | -17 | 28.3 | 3.9 | 2 | - |
CAGR Colour Code Guide ⓘ
| 9 Years | 5 Years | 3 Years | 1 Years | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales ⓘ | NA | 20.3% | 27% | 14.6% | ||||
| Adj EPS ⓘ | NA | 7.3% | 48.8% | 40.4% | ||||
| BVPSⓘ | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||||
| Share Price | - | - | - | - | ||||
Performance Ratio Colour Code Guide ⓘ
| Mar'11 | Mar'12 | Mar'13 | Mar'14 | Mar'15 | Mar'16 | Mar'17 | Mar'18 | Mar'19 | TTM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity % ⓘ | 7.8 | 11.1 | 9.6 | 14.7 | 12.7 | 5.3 | 7.6 | 10.7 | 13.3 | NAN |
| Op. Profit Mgn % ⓘ | -1.7 | -2.7 | -5.3 | 3 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.8 | NAN |
| Net Profit Mgn % ⓘ | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1 | 1.2 | NAN |
| Debt to Equity ⓘ | 0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | - |
| Working Cap Days ⓘ | 0 | 34 | 29 | 43 | 55 | 31 | 13 | 11 | 12 | 0 |
| Cash Conv. Cycle ⓘ | 0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
Sales growth is growing at healthy rate in last 3 years 27.01%
Return on Equity has declined versus last 3 years average to 0.00%
Sales growth is not so good in last 4 quarters at 0.00%
| Standalone | Consolidated | |
|---|---|---|
| TTM EPS (₹) | 0 | - |
| TTM Sales (₹ Cr.) | 90.5 | - |
| BVPS (₹.) ⓘ | 0 | - |
| Reserves (₹ Cr.) ⓘ | 7 | - |
| P/BV ⓘ | 0.00 | - |
| PE ⓘ | 0.00 | - |
| From the Market | |
|---|---|
| 52 Week Low / High (₹) | 0.00 / 0.00 |
| All Time Low / High (₹) | - / - |
| Market Cap (₹ Cr.) | 0 |
| Equity (₹ Cr.) | 0 |
| Face Value (₹) | - |
| Industry PE ⓘ | 3.6 |
| Pledged * | 0.00 |
MoneyWorks4Me rating and ranking of funds for SIP is available to subscribers only. Moneyworks4Me is not a rating and ranking agency, however it is required that users have a way of selecting funds and building a Portfolio. The method used by it are described below to enable users to understand the logic behind the rating and ranking Subscriber will find more details on this in the various content made available from time to time. In case you need more please write to besafe@moneyworks4Me.com
MoneyWorks4Me rates and ranks mutual funds based on the following data-driven system:
Funds ranking in screeners: Performance Consistency and Quality are two parameters used for ranking funds for SIP. The ranking as follows GG, GO, GR, OG, OO, OR, RG, RO and RR.
With the same color-coded funds, the one with the higher Average 3-year rolling returns (over 5 to 10 years), the number that appears in the Performance tag, ranks higher.
Here is the summary:
The third tag Upside Potential is not relevant for SIP. It is relevant for lumpsum investments in Mutual Funds.
Buy quality Stocks when they are available at reasonable prices and supported by an upward price trend and Sell when they are Overvalued using the Decizen Rating System. Covers 3500+ stocks
Download APP
