BSE: 0 | NSE: HIGHWAYS | Finance Term Lending | Small Cap
Past 10 year’s financial track record analysis by Moneyworks4me indicates that Highways Infrastructure Trust is a below average quality company.
No data found
No data found
Data adjusted to bonus, split, extra-ordinary income, rights issue and change in financial year end.
| Mar'23 | TTM | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Income (₹ Cr.) | 322 | 322 | ||||||||||
| YoY Gr. Rt. % | - | - | ||||||||||
| Adj EPS (₹ ) | 1 | 0 | ||||||||||
| YoY Gr. Rt. % | - | - | ||||||||||
| BVPS (₹ ) | 86.3 | 0 | ||||||||||
| YoY Gr. Rt. % | - | - | ||||||||||
| To view Net Profit/Total Funds (%) Colour Rating Guide click here ⓘ | ||||||||||||
| Net Profit/Total Funds (%) | 0.9 | 0 | ||||||||||
CAGR Colour Code Guide ⓘ
| 9 Years | 5 Years | 3 Years | 1 Years | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Interest Income | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||||||||
| Adj EPS | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||||||||
| BVPS | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||||||||
| Share Price | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
| RATIOS \ YEARS | Mar'23 | TTM | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Quality Ratio | To view Asset Quality Ratio Colour Rating Guide click here ⓘ | |||||||||||
| Net NPA to Net Advances (%) | 0 | - | ||||||||||
| Capitalization Ratio | To view Capitalization Ratio Colour Rating Guide click here ⓘ | |||||||||||
| Capital Adequacy Ratio (%) | 0 | - | ||||||||||
| Margins | ||||||||||||
| Net Profit Margin (%) | 13.2 | 0 | ||||||||||
| Performance Ratios | To view Performance Ratios Colour Rating Guide click here ⓘ | |||||||||||
| Return on Equity (%) | 1.2 | 0 | ||||||||||
No data to display
Return on Equity has declined versus last 3 years average to 0.00%
Total Income has declined 0.00 CAGR in last 3 years
Net Profit has declined 0.00 CAGR in last 3 years
Total income growth is poor in last 4 quarters
| Standalone | Consolidated | |
|---|---|---|
| TTM EPS (₹) | 0 | - |
| TTM Sales (₹ Cr.) | 322 | - |
| BVPS (₹.) ⓘ | 0 | - |
| Reserves (₹ Cr.) ⓘ | -572 | - |
| P/BV ⓘ | 0.00 | - |
| PE ⓘ | 0.00 | - |
| From the Market | |
|---|---|
| 52 Week Low / High (₹) | 0.00 / 0.00 |
| All Time Low / High (₹) | - / - |
| Market Cap (₹ Cr.) | 0 |
| Equity (₹ Cr.) | 0 |
| Face Value (₹) | 100 |
| Industry PE ⓘ | 14.2 |
| PARTICULARS | Mar'23 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity and Liabilities | ||||||||||
| Equity Capital | 3,583.49 | |||||||||
| Share Capital ⓘ | 4,155 | |||||||||
| Reserves ⓘ | -571.51 | |||||||||
| Minority Interest | 0 | |||||||||
| Long Term Borrowings | 1,402.42 | |||||||||
| Current Liabilities | 29.59 | |||||||||
| Trade Payables | 5.20 | |||||||||
| Short term borrowings | 0 | |||||||||
| Other Liabilities | -5.20 | |||||||||
| Total Liabilities ⓘ | 5,015.50 | |||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||
| Non Current Asset | 4,761.09 | |||||||||
| Loan Asset | 0 | |||||||||
| Other Non Current Asset ⓘ | 4,761.09 | |||||||||
| Current Asset | 254.41 | |||||||||
| Current Investment | 29.25 | |||||||||
| Other Current Asset | 225.16 | |||||||||
| Total Assets ⓘ | 5,015.50 | |||||||||
| PARTICULARS | Mar'23 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Operational & Financial Ratios |
||||||||||
| EPS (₹) | 1 | |||||||||
| DPS (₹) | 0 | |||||||||
| BVPS (₹) | 86 | |||||||||
Performance Ratios | ||||||||||
| ROA (%) | 0.9 | |||||||||
| ROE (%) | 1.2 | |||||||||
| ROCE (%) | 2.1 | |||||||||
Valuation Parameters | ||||||||||
| Price/Book(x) | 0.0 | |||||||||
MoneyWorks4Me rating and ranking of funds for SIP is available to subscribers only. Moneyworks4Me is not a rating and ranking agency, however it is required that users have a way of selecting funds and building a Portfolio. The method used by it are described below to enable users to understand the logic behind the rating and ranking Subscriber will find more details on this in the various content made available from time to time. In case you need more please write to besafe@moneyworks4Me.com
MoneyWorks4Me rates and ranks mutual funds based on the following data-driven system:
Funds ranking in screeners: Performance Consistency and Quality are two parameters used for ranking funds for SIP. The ranking as follows GG, GO, GR, OG, OO, OR, RG, RO and RR.
With the same color-coded funds, the one with the higher Average 3-year rolling returns (over 5 to 10 years), the number that appears in the Performance tag, ranks higher.
Here is the summary:
The third tag Upside Potential is not relevant for SIP. It is relevant for lumpsum investments in Mutual Funds.
Buy quality Stocks when they are available at reasonable prices and supported by an upward price trend and Sell when they are Overvalued using the Decizen Rating System. Covers 3500+ stocks
Download APP
